For example, I will claim that the Ice Climbers have a move that will end a characters life with one grab against any character on any level. Why disclude players? Well, not everyone is Jordan or Tiger Woods, those types of people come along so seldom and nearly unmatched in skill to the point where their efforts cannot be mimicked (example, aside from Ken, what Marth player has stood out in the country? Mew2King is beginning to make a run for it, but aside from him, almot no other Marth player has made an impact).Ĭalling for a character tier list deviod of human skill level is pointless, stupid in fact.
The reality is differant, we cannot prove what sort of potential one character has over another without the reliance on the metagame and looking at tournament results (mainly among the top 25-50 players in the country, or so, and usually discluding the top 2 or 3 players). In the early days of smash (when even the smash vetarans were youngin's), we (or rather they, the creators of the list) niavely made the tier list a list of what was considered to be "a characters potential" this of course meant when people realized Fox was freaking awesome, he jumped to the top immediately (and this was roughly right at the time too). Essentially the current tier list is a snap shot of how good each character roughly was when the list was made, but the tier list evolves as tactics change. Click to expand.Everyone in this thread should read delph's new thread, it will explain tiers for you.
0 kommentar(er)
